The article compares the recognition standards and penalties for drunk driving between Taiwan and major countries worldwide (including Japan, Singapore, the USA, the UK, France, Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, and Germany), highlighting Taiwan's leniency in drunk driving punishment. The author strongly criticizes Taiwan's drunk driving penalties as being too light, allowing the 'rich to always commit drunk driving as a misdemeanor, while the victims' suffering doubles,' and questions why politicians dare not increase penalties, even pointing out those with drunk driving records serving as government spokespeople to attack Taiwan's inaction on drunk driving prevention.
This article uses the "death penalty" issue as an example to discuss the problem of "black-and-white" extremism in social issues. The author, while not opposing the abolition of the death penalty, emphasizes that "the system itself must be respected." The article criticizes the Death Penalty Abolition Alliance for its crude and "overly superficial" handling of the issue, merely "negating" the death penalty without proposing alternative solutions acceptable to the public to achieve a balance between "perpetrators" and "victims." The article concludes that if a "seemingly" win-win strategy cannot be provided, or if one refuses to consider the opponent"s perspective, it will only intensify social polarization, creating a huge chasm.
Days ago, I learned of a truly heartbreaking news story. After many celebrities spoke out in condemnation yesterday, it naturally made headlines today. The keywords are Jinan Village, Ronald McDonald, and a halfway house for critically ill children with cancer. This article does not discuss information about critically ill children or cancer pathology, because it's simply unnecessary to discuss! I only offer opinions to those who anonymously spread black letters and those without medical knowledge...